Samuel Groth vs Jung-Woong Na Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Groth vs Na analysis and find out who is favored!
Samuel Groth vs Jung-Woong Na Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Groth 1 - 0 Na
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Groth has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Na has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Groth, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Na has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Groth has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Na has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Groth has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Na winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Groth has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 85/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 199/ 177). Na has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 30/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Groth winning 1 times and Na being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Groth winning 2 and Na winning 1. The last match between Groth and Na was at the Korea F1, 14-05-2012, Semifinals, Hard with Samuel Groth getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Groth and Na have played a deciding set 1 times, with Groth winning 1 times and Na 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Groth winning 0, and Na 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Groth has played against opponents with an average rank of while Na has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Groth has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Na has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Groth has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Na has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
53
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
404
High
31
Age
Plays
Form
57% (387-296)
Career Total W/L
61% (201-131)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$650,305
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Samuel Groth vs Jung-Woong Na For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Groth VS Na
stats | Samuel Groth | Jung-Woong Na |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 4-6 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Samuel Groth | Jung-Woong Na |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Samuel Groth Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Samuel Groth
Player
Manuel Sanchez
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
6 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Bublik
Player
Samuel Groth
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jung-Woong Na Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jae Myeong Lee
Player
Jung-Woong Na
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Jung-Woong Na
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Young Seok Lee
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Young Seok Kim
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Yongjun Shim
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jake Delaney
Player
Jung-Woong Na
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
78 of
105)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
28 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ryuki Matsuda
Player
Jung-Woong Na
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 7-6(7) 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matija Pecotic
Player
Jung-Woong Na
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Groth Vs Na Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Groth are available here and Na photos here.
![Groth Na H2h Summary Stats 30th June 2024 Groth Na H2h Summary Stats 30th June 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Samuel-Groth-Jung-Woong-Na-h2h-profile.webp)
![Samuel Groth Jung-Woong Na Prediction Stats Samuel Groth Jung-Woong Na Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Samuel-Groth-Jung-Woong-Na-h2h-stats.webp)